THE PROSECUTION CONNECTS EVERY DOT.

SOMEHOW, IT’S TRUMP’S FAULT

A plausible opening argument escalates into an extreme case against Trump.

Real event · sports · 2026-09-17

The prosecution's case: UN experts say grounds to believe US committed war crimes in Iran strikes

Final verdict announced: September 18, 2026 at 12:01 PM ET

Satire

The extreme prosecution of the sourced event.

What actually happened

Real headline

UN experts say grounds to believe US committed war crimes in Iran strikes

The US has not acknowledged carrying out February's deadly strikes on a primary school in Minab and a sports complex in Lamerd.

Original reporting

Sources

What the record shows

The US has not acknowledged the strikes in Iran.

The extreme prosecution

Opening Argument

The prosecution argues that the recent UN report alleging US war crimes in Iran is not just a mere accusation but a clear indication of a larger pattern of reckless behavior that can be traced back to the highest levels of the Trump administration. The prosecution submits that these strikes, which resulted in civilian casualties, are emblematic of a foreign policy that prioritizes aggression over diplomacy.

Exhibit A: The Plausible Link

The prosecution alleges that the decision to strike a primary school and a sports complex was influenced by Trump's inflammatory rhetoric, which emboldened military leaders to act without restraint. The prosecution imagines that this reckless decision-making is a direct result of Trump's disdain for international norms.

The Domino Effect

In the prosecution's theory, these strikes have set off a chain reaction of violence and instability in the region.

The Hidden Danger

The prosecution urges that the true danger lies in the normalization of such military actions, which could embolden future administrations to act similarly. The prosecution admits that this sets a dangerous precedent for international law and human rights.

Closing Argument

The prosecution submits that the evidence clearly points to a pattern of war crimes that cannot be ignored. The prosecutor imagines a future where such actions are commonplace, leading to a world where the US is seen as a rogue state.

Verdict

The prosecution urges the jury to consider the implications of these actions and to hold those responsible accountable.

Prosecution exhibits

  1. Prosecution theory: Trump's rhetoric emboldened military leaders.
  2. Prosecution theory: Strikes led to retaliation from Iran.
  3. Prosecution theory: This could escalate into a broader war.

Reality Check

The US has not acknowledged carrying out February's deadly strikes on a primary school in Minab and a sports complex in Lamerd.

Satirical commentary based on the sourced facts above. Not a news report, campaign, or endorsement.

See the opposite spin

Hub facts Somehow spin Not spin Compare both spins

· Next · Archive · Canonical: /somehow/stories/un-experts-say-grounds-to-believe-us-committed-war-crimes-in-iran-strike-ignrss